Just want to take moment to respond to today's editorial in the News-Times. In today's paper the editorial writer claims that the light turnout for the Public Hearing is somehow indicative of people not being engaged in the process.
I would disagree. Writing editorials means that you should do your homework,all too often the News-Times editorial page does not do its homework. Over the last six years we have had a total 6 public hearings on budgets. Guess what, this years turnout was the largest ever. In the past myself and the Council have sat in the Council Chambers with
no one showing up. That's right, not one member of the public came to speak on the proposed budget.
Remember this is the administration that has hosted Town Hall forums, Saturday's with the Mayor, put all agenda's, minutes, and meeting notices online in 5 different languages. We are the most open in the history of this City. Yes, I have even agreed to putting meetings on T.V. All good things for the voters.
People approach me many times when they are concerned about an issue. I wonder if it occurred to the author of today's piece that people are generally happy with the budget, and if they were not, we would know about it.
Finally there is concern about public participation in the Ad-Hoc meetings. Ad-Hocs are sub-committees set up by the Mayor to look at various issues and address concerns raised at the Council meetings. Ad-Hoc meetings are for the Council, the process set up and run is determined by the Chairman. Over the years Chairmen have run meetings in a variety of different ways. This is always the discretion of the chair.
Sorry News-Times "just 4" is a good sign that people in this City are happy with their government. If they weren't, trust me, I would know it....